Average speed cameras becoming common fixture on British roads

Average speed cameras becoming common fixture on British roads

Over 250 miles of roads in Great Britain are now being regularly monitored by average speed cameras, more than double the figure three years ago, finds new research.

The research, carried out for the RAC Foundation by Road Safety Analysis, found that average speed cameras were permanently installed on 256 miles of roads at the end of 2015, in addition to those used on a temporary basis for roadworks. This is more than double the figure of 117 miles at the end of 2012.

Last year saw 12 new systems installed, bringing the total number of stretches of road covered to 50.

A large part of the increase is down to the installation of average speed cameras on over 98 miles on the A9 in Scotland in a move to reduce accident rates.

Richard Owen, operations director at Road Safety Analysis, added that a further key reason for the increase in usage has been the reduction in how much it costs to install permanent cameras – it’s now typically around £100,000 per mile, compared with around £1.5m per mile in the early 2000s.

He added: “Some of the old fixed speed cameras have been around for 25 years and they are based on 35mm film. They are coming to the end of their life and are starting to be replaced, in some cases with average speed camera systems.”

The next part of the research will look at the cameras’ effectiveness in terms of reducing casualties.

Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, said: “Unsurprisingly, the indications are that compliance with the speed limit through stretches of road managed by average speed cameras is high, but the acid test is whether accident and casualty rates have also fallen.

“Rightly or wrongly many motorists perceive the current ‘spot’ speed cameras to be more about raising revenue for the Treasury than saving lives, but average speed cameras have greater potential to bring drivers on side. Clearly a high compliance rate means a very low penalty rate and hence both road safety and drivers wallets could benefit from greater use of these systems in appropriate places.”

Source: http://fleetworld.co.uk/news/2016/May/Average-speed-cameras-becoming-common-fixture-on-British-roads/0434025260

Horse Riders Face ‘Threat’ On Britain’s Roads

New statistics published by the British Horse Society (BHS) have highlighted the ‘threat’ horse riders face on Britain’s roads.

The data, published on 24 March, examines the incidents reported to the BHS’s horse accidents website. It reveals between November 2010 and 1 March 2016, 36 riders were killed as a result of road incidents involving horses that were reported to the charity. Released to coincide with the launch of a new BHS campaign, the data also highlights that the charity received a total of 2,070 reports of road incidents involving horses during the same period. The Dead Slow campaign urges drivers to slow down to 15mph when they meet a horse and rider on the road. The BHS says that 75% of accidents happened because the vehicle passed the horse without allowing enough space, claiming that ‘a lot of people aren’t sure how to safely pass a horse when driving’. As a result, BHS has published a video showing drivers how to pass a horse on the road. Lee Hackett, BHS director of policy, said: “We are asking drivers to slow down to 15mph when they see a horse on the road. A lot of people aren’t sure how to safely pass a horse when driving, and so we have produced a video showing exactly how it should be done. “It’s worth remembering that these statistics are just the accidents reported to us, there will be countless others. Almost everyone who rides horses can recount a story about a time they had a near miss on the roads. “We are campaigning for legislative change, but that can take a long time. That is why we are asking for this instant change in behaviour from drivers.”

See more at: http://www.roadsafetygb.org.uk/news/4979.html#sthash.XzNBeRhC.dpuf

New Measures To Help Learner Drivers And Punish Dangerous Drivers

Learner driver;

  • DfT road safety plan to build on Britain’s excellent road safety record
  • £2 million for research into driver education, including the possibility of giving learner drivers motorway experience with an instructor before taking their test
  • £750,000 grant for police forces to build drug-driving enforcement capability

The Department for Transport today (21 December 2015) unveiled a raft of measures to improve the safety of Britain’s roads.

The proposals will ensure learner drivers are properly prepared before their test, including the chance to gain motorway experience with an approved driving instructor. This follows plans announced last month to introduce a deposit which is returned to the learner driver if they pass, encouraging them to take their test when they are ready.

Other measures to take priority in the government’s plan for road safety include funding to train the next generation of cyclists and extra money for police forces to crack down on drug drivers.

The plan outlines how the government is delivering on its commitment to reduce the number of people killed and injured on our roads during this Parliament.

The main proposals announced today are:

  • learner drivers will for the first time be offered the opportunity to drive on motorways •the proposals would see learners allowed to take a motorway driving lesson with an approved driving instructor in a dual controlled car – this is designed to make drivers safer once they have passed their test
  • police forces across the country will be able to remove more dangerous drivers from UK roads, thanks to new government funding •£750,000 grant for police forces in England and Wales will fund more officers with drug recognition and impairment testing skills to enable more effective and targeted enforcement
  • a grant of £50 million over the next 4 years will support Bikeability cycle training in schools •this funding will help to increase children’s road awareness, encouraging children to be healthy and active
  • since its inception, more than 1.5 million school children have received training through the Bikeability scheme – we expect to train 275,000 children during 2015/16
  • the government will consult on changes to improve cycle safety to ensure sideguards are not removed from HGVs but remain permanently fitted
  • the Compulsory Basic Training (CBT) for learner motorcyclists will be strengthened and there will be a consultation on a range of further proposals to support safer motorcycling
  • a £2 million in-depth research programme will be launched to identify the best possible driver education, training and behaviour-change interventions for learner and novice drivers
  • motorists who endanger lives by using hand held mobile phones while driving will face an increase from the current 3 penalty points to 4, while the fixed penalty notice will rise from £100 to £150 •for larger vehicles such as HGVs where the consequences of an accident can be much more severe, the penalty will increase from the current 3 points to 6 and the fixed penalty notice will rise from £100 to £150

Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin said:

“Britain has some of the safest roads in the world but we are always looking to improve that record.

“Today we are delivering common sense proposals that balance tougher penalties for dangerous drivers with practical steps to help youngsters and other more vulnerable groups stay safe on our roads.”

Steve Gooding, Director of the RAC Foundation, said:

“One in five young drivers has an accident within 6 months of passing their test so putting the learning process under the spotlight has to be a good thing.

“Mile for mile motorways are our safest roads but can be intimidating places for novice drivers. Exploring ways of letting learners have controlled access to them is welcome.

“The important thing is the official seal of approval provided by the approved driving instructor who will accompany them down the slip-road. This is definitely not the time to have mum or dad in the passenger seat.”

A series of consultations on the specific proposals announced today will follow next year (2016).

Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-unveils-host-of-measures-to-further-improve-road-safety

s300_12088025653_0695f113d0_o

Drinking & Driving: Consequences

Think what a drink drive conviction could cost you. There are strict penalties including:

  • A minimum 12 month driving ban
  • A criminal record
  • A fine of up to £5,000
  • An endorsement on your licence for 11 years

Plus the everyday consequences of a conviction that could include:

  • An increase in your car insurance premium
  • Losing your job
  • Trouble getting in to countries like the USA
  • The shame of having a criminal record
  • Loss of independence

The Institute of Advanced Motorists calculate that a drink drive conviction could cost between £20,000 – £50,000 as a result of fines, solicitors fees, increase in car insurance and loss of job.

Think what a drink drive conviction could cost you. If you drink, don’t drive.

Read Ed, Steve, Jess’s and Suzanne’s stories of having a drink drive conviction here.

Jess, 21 from the Forest of Dean, was banned from driving for 18 months

I had never been in trouble with the police before and I’ll never forget the experience of being arrested, booked into the police cells and being treated like a criminal. It was a moment of madness but it’s had a massive effect on my life. Because of the court hearings and time off work I lost my job and I’m still unemployed now. There isn’t much public transport where I live and because I can’t drive I’ve lost some of my friends. I want to warn others of the consequences of drink driving, because my life will never be the same again. I’m just so glad I didn’t hurt or even kill anyone through my actions.

Ed is 24 and from Cheltenham and faces life with a criminal conviction

I was stopped just before midnight on a bank holiday Monday. I was on my way to see a friend for some support after a very emotional argument with my girlfriend. I knew I was over the drink drive limit but was under the illusion that I would be ok, that I wouldn’t get caught and that ultimately, it was just a short journey so what were the chances?!  When I was stopped I was feeling confident, that I could try and persuade the officers that I was not in fact intoxicated. You’d be surprised at how badly booze sticks to your breath, your clothes and no matter how hard you try, you cannot act sober.

I knew that the breath test would be positive and I had attempted to prepare for that feeling. When the officer told me I had blown 52 and the limit was 35 I was absolutely devastated, angry and upset.

I have never been arrested before and never been in a cell. For whatever reason, and to this day I still don’t know why, I was kept in a cell for 13 hours. I had all that time in complete silence thinking about what I had done and the implications on my life, and others. It was the most humbling experience I have ever had.

My friends and family were very disappointed that I had decided to drive that evening. It caused problems with my 2 year relationship (that has now been resolved) with my girlfriend and friends judged me for my poor decision making. I think and hope that they all forgive me for what I did but it’s a horrible feeling knowing that I have now been tarnished with that brush.

I had never been to court and it was a very daunting experience. I had my father with me for moral support and a solicitor present. When I was handed my sentence my whole life as I knew it was turned upside down. From that moment for the rest of my life I now had a criminal conviction.

Steve is 45 and from Cheltenham and talks about life without a licence

Thanks for giving me the opportunity to pass on my experience, having had nearly a year without my licence.

I counted myself as a professional driver – a Sales Manager driving an average of 35k miles a year for the past 27 years. I didn’t normally drink/ drive – in fact my partner is teetotal and always happy to drive!

On the day I “Got Done” I had been in my local pub for a couple on a Sunday lunchtime and drove less than a mile home. I thought I’d be fine. I shouldn’t have had any.

Half way back, I was in collision with a left hand drive lorry, who cut the corner.  The accident would have taken place had I had a drink or not – but the consequences very different!

You go to court – it’s a criminal offence, your name is in the paper.

Until it happens to you, you just don’t realise how difficult life is without a car – standing at bus stops in the rain and cold – waiting for trains – not just occasionally – but every day – for 15 months in my case. My income has been cut in half – I am one of the lucky ones – I have a job, but over half the people I have met who have lost their licences – lost their jobs.

Just going shopping, getting about I have had to rely on friends and family, it’s like being a child again – please can you take me to….. Any chance you can pick me up from….

Getting to an appointment last week involved 4 trains, 2 buses and cadging a lift (twice actually) – what would have been 5/6 hours turned into a 14 hour day – and that was just Monday!

I am not seeking sympathy – I was the fool who got behind the wheel! I am currently 2 weeks into a 4 week driver rehabilitation course – reduces your ban, but you lose 4 Saturdays – then realise what effect the stupidity and selfishness of drink driving has on others!

And, I was lucky – in my case nobody was injured…or worse.

Suzanne’s Story: What a drink drive conviction cost me

Married mum-of-two Suzanne from Gloucestershire is currently banned for drink driving following a collision on her way home from lunch:

I’d had two or three glasses of wine with lunch. I felt fine and I thought it would be ok to drive. I was only three miles from home, after all.

Unfortunately I had a bump, colliding side on with an oncoming car as I went round a bend. Apparently I veered over the centre line of the road. Thankfully nobody was hurt – I would never ever have forgiven myself if they had been.

The police were called and both parties were breathalysed, which is standard I believe. I was arrested for being over the limit, taken to the police station and held in the cells for over four hours.

The whole thing seemed surreal, I couldn’t believe something like that could happen to me. I’d never been in a police station before and had a clean licence. I felt absolutely shocked and humiliated.

I was bailed on condition that I make an appointment to attend two sessions with a counsellor for the Independence Trust to talk through my actions and what was likely to happen next. Rather stupidly I thought that involved a fine and some points on my licence. I was horrified to hear that I would definitely be banned for driving for at least 12 months. I had no idea how severe the penalty would be.

It was about six weeks after my arrest before I was due to appear in court. We live in a small village community and news spreads like wild fire. I really didn’t want anyone to see me.

Waiting for my court appearance was a horrible, nerve-wracking experience. And having to stand in the dock while my immediate future was being decided by a magistrate was just awful. I felt so humiliated.

I was banned for 15 months. I had to pay a fine of £360 and my licence was taken away.

My family were so ashamed and disappointed in me, as I was with myself. I had no idea how far reaching the consequences of my conviction would be.

School runs: we live in the country and I have two children to take to and from school in Gloucester. I was part of a rota with other parents and my loss of licence meant I could no longer take my children to school.

My eldest child was due to take his GCSE exams and I couldn’t personally take him to and from them. With some complicated planning and my husband having to rearrange his work schedule, through friends and local taxi companies we managed – but it was awful.

The same was true of sports fixtures and play dates for my children, which took a lot of planning and a lot of favours. I was determined my own stupidity wouldn’t impact on their lives.

The worst for me was the fact that my parents, who are in their late 80s, live an hour-and-a-half away. It now takes a taxi, two train journeys and a half-mile walk to get to them. I pray that they don’t get taken ill as I cannot get to them quickly now.

For me personally, I feel so very isolated. We live in the country and I am now reliant on my husband, my friends and a local taxi driver. And I still have another seven months to go.

The effects are so wide reaching. My eldest child will soon be eligible to drive but I won’t be able to help him learn.

We have relatives in Canada but I will never be able to visit as they won’t accept anyone with a drinking under the influence conviction. Similarly, if we want to go on holiday to America I’ll need to attend an interview with the American Embassy in London.

My insurance premiums will be very expensive and it’s unlikely that I’ll be able to hire a car or be given a courtesy car when my car is in for service. My conviction will be on my licence for 11 years and I will have a permanent criminal record. All for a few glasses of wine with lunch.

Imagine if I’d hurt someone – it wouldn’t just be the 15 months of regret and recriminations – it would have been a lifetime. Those few glasses were the most expensive I have ever had.

Source: Gloucestershire Road Safety Partnership

http://roadsafety-gloucestershire.org.uk/drink-drug-drive/drink-drug-drive-consequences/#Jess

Working Cameras Going Yellow

Camera

All working speed cameras on the strategic road network will be yellow by October 2016.
Ministers ordered a review of speed camera policy on motorways earlier this year and Highways England has confirmed its plan to increase the visibility of all speed cameras on the
network.
Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin said:

“We are on the side of honest motorists. I’ve always been clear that cameras should be visible and get used for safety rather than revenue raising. This move is about applying common sense to our roads. Speed cameras should make journeys safer rather than lead to dangerous braking. I’m delighted Highways England has agreed to meet our timetable to achieve this.”

There are approximately 200 camera sites on England’s motorways, some of which contain multiple cameras.

Existing guidelines already make clear that where cameras are used on the strategic road network signs must be put up to alert drivers. This latest move will ensure maximum visibility of the cameras themselves.

The majority of colour changes will take place during standard renewal of speed camera units alongside other planned work to minimise the cost. Units which are not due to be upgraded within this time frame will be made yellow.

Highways England will be monitoring its camera sites to address any impact the change in colour has for drivers.
The government has also taken action at a local level. Local authorities and the police are required to publish information on the impact of speed cameras on road safety, so that they can be held accountable locally.

Clear guidance for local authorities on speed cameras states that fixed speed camera housings located within an area of street or highway lighting should be coloured yellow either by painting both the front and back of the housing or covering both the front and back of the housing with retro-reflective sheeting. In an area not covered by street or highway lighting, the speed camera housing should be treated with yellow retro-reflective sheeting.

Source: AIRSO 27/11/2015

TRL develops eCall test procedures ahead of 2018 deadline

TRL develops eCall test procedures ahead of 2018 deadline

The Transport Research Laboratory (TRL), has developed new test procedures for the European type-approval of eCall in-vehicle systems.

The eCall system installs a device in vehicles that will automatically alert emergency services in the event of a serious road accident.

Following legislation from the European Parliament and EU member states, eCall will become mandatory across Europe from 2018 in a move to reduce the time it takes for the emergency services to reach casualties, thereby improving survival chances.

The European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) points to research which shows that with eCall, emergency service response time will be cut by around 50% in rural areas and 40% in urban areas. And a German study, “STORM” (Stuttgart Transport Operation by Regional Management), showed almost 50% rescue time improvement in rural areas, with a net gain of around 10 minutes.

The system works by wirelessly sending airbag deployment and impact sensor information, as well as GPS coordinates, to local emergency agencies.

The TRL draft proposals, which were developed for the European Commission, provide recommendations on the safety requirements for eCall systems and aim to ensure that sub-standard system designs, which could jeopardise the safety of road users, will not be allowed onto the European market.

Matthias Seidl, senior vehicle safety researcher at TRL, said: “Our in-house test sled allows us to simulate collisions with peak decelerations considerably higher than most current vehicle tests. These high levels are necessary to ensure that eCall systems are still able to make an emergency call, even after a severe crash.”

“The results can be used to help shape the technical discussions at an international level in order to ensure that the same level of protection is provided to road users around the world. In fact, the suggested European standards have also been proposed to the United Nations working group on automatic emergency call systems.”

– See more at: http://www.roadsafetygb.org.uk/news/4703.html

Source: Road Safety GB 13/11/15

Pedestrian safety the focus for latest Euro NCAP tests

Pedestrian safety the focus for latest Euro NCAP tests

Wednesday 11th November 2015

Euro NCAP has put the focus on pedestrian safety with a new test that will check how well vehicles autonomously detect and prevent collisions with pedestrians.

With new vehicles offering more autonomous driver assist systems, the European safety organisation says its autonomous emergency braking (AEB) pedestrian tests will make it simpler for consumers and manufacturers to find out which systems work best.

The tests will examine a vehicle’s response to pedestrians in simulations of the most common urban scenarios: adults walking and running into the vehicle’s path and a child stepping out from behind a parked car.

To score well, vehicles should be able to prevent collisions with specially developed pedestrian dummies at speeds of up to 40kmh (25mph). At higher speeds of 40-60kmh (25-37mph ), the AEB system should aim to reduce the collision speed to less than 25mph, making the impact more survivable.

Dr Michiel van Ratingen, Euro NCAP secretary general, said: “These new tests are the first in the world to assess highly automated vehicle features and driver assistance systems from the pedestrian’s perspective.

“Many new cars now offer some form of AEB system that can help prevent car-to-car collisions, but only some are also able to detect pedestrians.

“Vehicles designed to perform well in these tests will be better equipped to prevent these thousands of needless deaths and life-changing injuries on our European roads.

“Therefore, from 2016 the rating will give credit to vehicle models that offer this capability. At the same time, these tests will make it possible for new car buyers and fleet operators to make an informed choice.”

Euro NCAP says it has been assessing pedestrian protection since 1997 and has awarded higher scores in its safety ratings to vehicles designed with forgiving front-ends. The organisation started testing the effectiveness of manufacturers’ AEB systems in preventing car-to-car collisions in 2013 and is planning to extend the assessment of AEB systems for vulnerable road users to cyclists in the coming years.

AEB Pedestrian systems are already offered on several vehicles tested by Euro NCAP including Audi Q7, BMW 2-Series and BMW i3, Ford Mondeo, Lexus NX, Mercedes C-Class, Mini Cooper, Volvo V40, XC90, Toyota Avensis and VW Passat.

– See more at: http://www.roadsafetygb.org.uk/news/4697.html#sthash.rQ4QLDvp.dpuf

Source: Road Safety UK

British Drivers Find Some Road Signs Confusing

c60b9c_249b8605e71a41e89ae6700374f261a8.jpg_srb_p_155_105_75_22_0.50_1.20_0

British drivers find road signs confusing with some not even able to recognise the national speed limit.

A survey found that 90% of British drivers said they found road signs confusing, with a third unable to recognise the national speed limit and more than 40% confused by the ‘no vehicles’ sign.

Sixty years after the introduction of standardised road signs in the UK, the figures, from car finance broker Zuto, found that almost half of drivers believed that there were too many signs on the road, with one-in-twenty admitting they’ve made driving mistakes due to confusing road signs.

Almost one in ten said they found the ‘men’ at work road sign sexist and due for a makeover, while over four million UK drivers don’t understand the ‘level crossing without a barrier’ sign, a further 31% failed to recognise the National Speed Limit sign.

 James Wilkinson, CEO of Zuto, commented: “As the research has shown, I’m sure every motorist can relate to being baffled by road signs at some point and, after 60 years serving the UK roads, perhaps it’s time for some signs to enter retirement.”

The research also revealed that one in four don’t recognise the ‘Cars & Motorbikes Prohibited’ sign, with 13% incorrectly believing the exact opposite of the sign’s meaning – that cars and motorbikes are allowed.

But Britain’s most confusing sign is one only half of all motorists recognise, the admittedly bizarre sign for ‘no vehicles carrying explosives’, while almost a quarter don’t understand the archaic ‘no horse drawn vehicles’ sign.

Confusing road signs:

  • Signs which tell drivers to increase space – 42%

  • Signs which warn of emergency vehicles approaching – 41%

  • Signs which tell drivers using mobile phones to stop – 41%

  • Signs which all read the same in critical situations i.e. emergency – 36%

  • Signs which allow drivers to communicate i.e. Stop Tailgating! – 27%

  • Signs which graphically depict accidents to deter reckless driving – 18%

  • Hologram signs on the road, rather than on the sides, to avoid distraction – 13%

Source; adi NEWS

http://www.adinews.co.uk/#!British-drivers-confused-by-road-signs/c1nni/5629f1fc0cf201c73ae57204

New rules about tobacco, e-cigarettes and smoking: 1 October 2015

Published

From 1 October 2015 it will be illegal:

  • for retailers to sell electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) or e-liquids to someone under 18
  • for adults to buy (or try to buy) tobacco products or e-cigarettes for someone under 18
  • to smoke in private vehicles that are carrying someone under 18

2. Rules about smoking in private vehicles

From 1 October 2015, private vehicles must be smokefree if they are enclosed, there is more than one person present and one of them is under 18.

So it will be an offence:

  • for a person of any age to smoke in a private vehicle that is carrying someone who is under 18
  • for a driver (including a provisional driver) not to stop someone smoking in these circumstances

The rules don’t apply to e-cigarettes.

2.1 Penalties

The fixed penalty notice fine for both offences is £50. Somebody who commits both offences could get 2 fines. Private vehicles must be carrying more than one person to be smokefree so somebody who is 17 and smoking alone in a private vehicle won’t be committing an offence.

Enforcement officers (usually the police) will use their discretion to decide whether to issue a warning or a fixed penalty notice, or whether to refer an offence to court.

2.2 What classes as an enclosed vehicle

The legislation covers any private vehicle that is enclosed wholly or partly by a roof. A convertible car, or coupe, with the roof completely down and stowed is not enclosed and so isn’t covered by the legislation. But a vehicle with a sunroof open is still enclosed and so is covered by the legislation.

Sitting in the open doorway of an enclosed vehicle is covered by the legislation.

The rules apply to motorhomes, campervans and caravans when they are being used as a vehicle but don’t apply when they are being used as living accommodation.

The rules don’t apply to:

  • boats, ships and aircraft, as they have their own rules
  • work vehicles and public transport, as they are already covered by smokefree legislation

2.3 Why the law is changing

Every time a child breathes in secondhand smoke, they breathe in thousands of chemicals. This puts them at risk of serious conditions, such as meningitis, cancer and respiratory infections such as bronchitis and pneumonia. It can also make asthma worse.

Secondhand smoke is dangerous for anyone, but children are especially vulnerable, because they breathe more rapidly and have less developed airways, lungs and immune systems. Over 80% of cigarette smoke is invisible and opening windows does not remove its harmful effect.

The law is changing to protect children and young people from such harm.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/new-rules-about-tobacco-e-cigarettes-and-smoking-1-october-2015/new-rules-about-tobacco-e-cigarettes-and-smoking-1-october-2015